Gearhead
Expired Membership-
Posts
971 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
27 ExcellentAbout Gearhead
- Birthday 11/25/1970
Personal Information
-
Name
Jeremy
location
-
Location
Tucson, AZ, United States
Converted
-
City
Tucson
Converted
-
State/Province
AZ
Converted
-
Home Country
United States
Converted
-
Bike Year and Model
'87 Venture Royale, '05 Suzuki VStrom 650
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
MK 2 water pump question
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Thanks! -
MK 2 water pump question
Gearhead posted a topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Howdy folks. Quick question: do the Mk II's (87) also have the plastic water pump impeller from the factory? -
coolant blowout
Gearhead replied to Venture Capitalist's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Quick question: do the Mk II's (87) also have the plastic water pump impeller from the factory? Congrats Cap on the fix. Quite an adVenture you had! -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Thanks. And I still have a bike... But it's finally only one bike! The VStrom keeps me entertained these days. -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
After finishing up this project in September as reported, the bike has been for sale on Craigs and FB Marketplace. Turns out it's not that easy to sell an old but nice, high mileage, full-dress touring bike in Autumn and Winter. Dang. Had several trade offers...no thanks, I trade for cash...until someone traded me an old, high-end Fender Stratocaster that tickled my fancy. Takes up much less space than the Venture! I watched my ol' friend ride off a week and a half ago. So, buyer-Charley is happy, I'm happy, and the ol' friend is back on the road daily like it should be...with a new friend. This community has been so soo awesome and helpful over the years. Holy cow, I joined in 2006 and made almost 1000 posts! Tempis fugit, as they say. Thanks to ALL for your kind participation. Special thanks to the tech gurus along the way, most recently Puc and Patch (and many others). And extra special thanks to Freebird for holding it all together and keeping this ship afloat. I am thankful to you all. God bless! Jeremy in Tucson -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
FINAL UPDATE: for anybody who’s still reading. I reached a 97% solution. Good enough. Pilot screws are still out too far, but once fairly warm the throttle response off idle is pretty good, and it feels good taking off with the clutch now. The bike is ALL BACK TOGETHER with all the plastic installed for the first time in 3.5 years, and it feels good! Key points: #155 Pilot Air Jet#2: This is an important aspect, down from stock 170. If I had a little smaller ones like 140, I’d try those, but I don’t. If I wanted to take the carbs apart again I’d try 42.5 pilot fuel jets (stock 37.5), but I DEFINITELY don’t want to do that! Aftermarket Slides: I realized that the aftermarket slides don’t quite clock the slide correctly with respect to the carburetor. The diaphragms are rotated a bit on the slide bodies. All 3 are the same, so they just seem to make them this way. I compared them to my 4th slide which is a low-mileage used OEM part. The lift hole is supposed to be straight down toward the throttle plate, and on the aftermarket ones it was off by maybe 15-20 degrees to one side. I trimmed the clocking tabs off the diaphragms and rotated them so the lift holes were straight down. I think this made a small difference in slide and throttle response. Pilot Screws: Patch, I followed your suggestion and tried riding the bike with all the screws set at 2 turns, 4 turns, and compared to the settings I came up with for best idle. The differences in throttle response were quite small, which is a little surprising to me. I left them at what seemed like the best for idle and throttle response: #1 – 4.5 turns, #2 – 3 turns, #3 – 3 turns, #4 – 3.5 turns. At all-2-turns it wasn’t bad. Idle speed was down maybe 100 rpm, throttle response off slightly. At all-4-turns it was almost the same as my optimal settings. Last Question: Does ANY fuel come out of the needle / needle jet at idle? If so, maybe replacing my old ovaled-out needle jets (with factory new) was the “big change”. Takeaways: - Just because I think I can understand everything doesn’t mean I actually will! - I still don’t understand what makes it different from before the teardown requiring a jetting change. That just feels wrong. So be it. - These Mikuni carbs are complex, more so than some of the other MC carbs I’ve worked on. - Aftermarket parts always carry some risk of being not totally right. - Choosing to forgo complete carb rebuild kits and piecemealing instead is risky, can cause much time and expense in the long haul. That said, this approach has worked fine a number of times in the past. - Thank God for this community who loves to help, particularly Puc and Patch! Jeremy -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Today I replaced 8 tiny o-rings - 4 on the pilot screws, 4 under the diaphragm caps. They seemed OK and weren't high on the suspect list, and I don't think replacing them changed anything :-( Per Patch's suggestion, I removed the air filter and lid (airbox bottom in place) and observed the slide movements. It doesn't run right or take throttle well at all like this, but I remember that was always the case; I think it's normal for these bikes. I posted some videos, get 'em now before they go on Netflix None of the slides stick. The light reflects differently off #2 than the others which makes it look different already on the videos, but I think #2 consistently moves more vigorously and responds quicker than the other 3. What's interesting about that is that #2 IS different - it's a OEM part with limited use on it. The other 3 are all new aftermarket replacements that I just bought a couple months ago. I verified that the slide lift hole is the same size on the aftermarket units; I'll double check that it's oriented correctly. Tomorrow I plan to run it with pilot screws all at 2 then 4 turns and observe any difference, then take a look at the slides and needles. Maybe I'll shim the needles up .020 per Puc's suggestion. Jeremy -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Gotcha, they are clean. Slides are new and move freely. Springs are stock, same as I pulled out. I need to run it and observe with the airbox lid removed. Needles look good. Emulsion tubes are NEW – so that’s a change from before I took it apart. They were worn oval, so were rich, now are not. I ordered factory parts from Yammy, so they should be good. Fuel level is good and consistent, and the bike pulls great under WOT. These two things make it unlikely that fuel supply to the carbs is insufficient. I tried replacing the Pilot Air Jets#2 this morning, out with the stock 170’s, in with 155’s. It did fatten the pilot mix just a bit. Throttle response is slightly better, but not quite perfect. Pilot screws are a little more reasonable, but still don’t behave like I am accustomed to. Remember that before all this nonsense I had them tuned to 2 turns or less. 1 – 3.5 2 – 2 3 – 2 4 – 3 If I screw them in more the idle degenerates and the throttle response gets worse. I haven’t tried yet to set them all to 2 and then to 4 turns, need to do that. BUT, lean pilot usually causes a hanging idle, and I don’t have that symptom! O-rings seemed fine. I will replace them. The screws look normal, same as when I first pulled them out. The tips look good to me. I didn’t connect a tach, was setting by ear for max rpm, so I don’t have a rpm drop figure. I can try to connect my tune-up tach, I think I’ve done it before. Jeremy -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Thanks Patch. Looking for clarification on this. Are these tiny ports you are referring to in the jet block? If so, I cleaned them as well. If not, help me find them! Thanks! Jeremy -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Just a little bump on my last question. Does 160 seem a good size to try for the pilot air jet 2? Also, I should know this, but are those the same jet type as the main jet? -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Been doin other stuff, can't work on the Venture for a couple more weeks. I talked to Puc (thanks again) and have a couple things to try from him and Patch. Puc suggested raising my needles with one washer, just to see what happens, cuz it's pretty easy. Got me thinking. I've been approaching this not as a tuning issue, but rather a "something went wrong" issue. Which still seems like it must be the case, but I can't find it. At this point, what if I try a little smaller pilot air jet #2? They are easy to get to under the diaphragms, and I know that will richen the mix at idle and initial throttle response; remember when I plugged those jets with toothpicks? My pilot mix got WAY rich, makes sense. So I'm thinking about picking up a set of, hmmmm, maybe 160's to replace the stock 170's? Opinions? Does anyone know offhand what type of Mikuni jets those are, and the cheapest place to buy them? Thanks, Jeremy -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Must be my old home number. Just pm'd you my cell! -
I just wanted to offer an update on the particular question I posited about the Coasting Enricher system: "Are there any other side effects to disabling this system?" (Read OP for details.) I don't have a bulletproof conclusion due to the way everything has gone down, details in my main Carb Problem thread. https://www.venturerider.org/forum/s...67#post1062867 But at this point, my testing suggests that the answer is NO. If you block the vacuum ports to the Coasting Enricher diaphragms, I believe the carbs will work just fine with the exception of popping in the pipes on decel. I had not found much on this topic, so I wanted to offer my semi-substantiated conclusion to wrap this thread up. Take it for what it's worth!
-
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
Hello helpful fellow Venturers. I’m sad to report that I have done ALL the stuff and the bike runs the SAME. Seriously. After putting it together the first time 2 or 3 months ago, it ran great at anything mid range or top end. It was lean on the pilots, had pilot screws way out to help compensate, but it wasn’t right and wasn’t quite enough so it had a bit of a stumble off idle. And now it still does the exact same thing. Since that first time, as a recap, I’ve replaced stiff / sketchy slides, replaced and re-enabled the Coasting Enrichers, replaced the jet block gaskets and a few other things, fine-tuned the float levels, de-carboned the engine per the enclosed instructions, thoroughly checked out the spark and timing, and probably a few other things. And it runs EXACTLY THE SAME! I can’t remember a time I’ve been so frustratingly unsuccessful with an engine. That tells me the carbs aren’t really ALL THAT sensitive to minor stuff, but they’re sure sensitive to something I did. Before I took these apart way back I had the pilots set between 1.5 and 2.5 turns and off-idle response and power were fine. PATCH – COWPUC – MARCARL – ANYONE ELSE WITH CARB EXPERIENCE - I’m issuing one more call (beg?) for a great idea before I sell the bike as-is. In retrospect, I shoulda sold it 2.5 months ago. Actually, in better retro-retro-spect I shoulda sold it 3.5 years ago before taking it apart in the first place. Here’s my current stats / adjustments: PILOTS (turns): 1 – 4.5 2 – 2.25 3 – 2.5 4 – 3.25 So overall, they are a bit less “far out” than some of the previous iterations. But not normal. COMPRESSION (PSI, checked cold as before, 5 revs / 10 revs): 1 – 180 / 190 2 – 175 / 185 3 – 180 / 190 4 – 180 / 190 Just slightly less than before de-carboning. Very consistent, did each one 4+ times. I checked my gage with my shop air, and it’s quite accurate at 95 psi. FLOATS / FUEL LEVELS (idling, spec is -15.5 to -16.5mm): 1 - -16 2 - -16 3 - -15.5 4 - -16 I mentioned that sometimes #4 would change levels, dropping and sometimes rising rapidly. I think I figured out why. The engine was HOT at that point, burns on the backs of my fingers to prove it. I did #4 last. I think fuel boils in the tube right where it comes out of the bowl when I take too long and it has time to heat up. If I drained some fuel from the check tube and quickly checked again, it would be steady. There’s no way that a sticking float would cause the level to drop quickly…rise, yes, but not drop, because an idling engine doesn’t use fuel fast enough to do that. Anyway, all good now. SYNC: I did the bench sync, then small adjustments with mercury sticks while idling, maybe ¾ turn max. The work done this last time was de-carboning the engine according to Patch’s procedure (and yes, black stuff came out), new Coasting Enricher diaphragms, another thorough check of #3 pilot circuit, and adjust #3 and 4 floats. Lots of oil changes afterward, one more to come. A couple other observations: -- As before, the hotter it gets the better it is, consistent with lean. It’s ALMOST normal when good and hot, but a quick rev off idle, or taking off from a start with low revs reveals the hesitation. When only “warm” but not “hot” it is more pronounced. -- I checked for vacuum leaks with water, carb cleaner, and an unlit propane torch. Sprayed all 3 (separately of course) EVERYWHERE on and around the carbs, no effect on idle at all. -- It sure does act like it’s getting extra air from somewhere, or kinda like the airbox is not installed. The spray check shows no leaks, see above. -- If I shot propane into the airbox intake for a few seconds, it would start to die from lack of air. But if I shot it in there just for a second and revved the engine, it revved quickly and took throttle like it is supposed to. It needs that extra fuel. -- Regarding the pilot passages in the main carb bodies: there are 2 places the pilot mix comes out, at the adjustment screw and at a pattern of 3 tiny holes near the throttle plate. When I had them apart, I could SEE on all the carbs the spray flowing freely and equally from all those holes. This was when I had the jet blocks off and shot fuel in the appropriate port that leads to that area. -- I'll mention the pilot jets again. I've stuck a wire thru them, soaked them a bit, shot spray through them countless times, blew air, and looked at light thru them carefully with my reading glasses on. All 4 are (and always were) clear. The light visible through them is round and the same size on all 4 of them. I know these are the first suspect, but they are clean! Well, that’s all. Thanks for sticking with me through this trial. Special thanks to Patch who surely knows more about how the IC engine works than most of us have forgotten. Remember, I’m still looking for that one genius idea…. Jeremy -
87 VR, carb problem
Gearhead replied to Gearhead's topic in Venture and Venture Royale Tech Talk ('83 - '93)
OK, cylinder fogging / soaking in progress. Carbs in work...again. Coasting Enrichers, new diaphragms installed, restored to normal functionality. Carb#3 - verified once more that all pilot passages are PERFECTLY clean. Addressing float levels on #3 and 4. Reminder, checked per the book with the engine idling, spec is -16 +-.5 mm, #3 was at -17mm (1 mm low), and #4 moved around from -17 to -20mm, mostly between -18 to -19. There's a couple things weird about these. First, the moving around of #4 is obviously weird. FP is producing plenty of flow, evidenced by key on open flow, and also the fact that the bike runs great while hard on the gas in an acceleration run. Other 3 carbs are rock steady. Seems like float must be sticking, but I seen no evidence of that, or any reason why it would stick that I can tell by looking in there. That said, it's difficult to tell for sure because it might be hanging up on the fuel bowl which is removed for inspection. Another thing, looking back in my records, I checked the fuel levels a couple times before. #4 has always run a little low, and not super consistent, so this is an old and persistent condition. Ideas? Second, the levels I'm measuring 1) on the bike idling, 2) wet on the bench while tapping carbs, and 3) dry on the bench aren't consistent. I'm assuming method 1 should be the trump method, the one method to rule them all The others are in-process indicators. When I bench checked them (method 2) over a month ago I found #3 and #4 to be spot on, but then on the bike they ran low as indicated above. And using method 3, these two floats have to be set quite high compared to how others set their carbs, as if my floats are super buoyant. Refer to the following thread about bench testing, post #4 , my floats #3 and 4 are now set to 25.5mm by the measurement shown in those photos: https://www.venturerider.org/forum/showthread.php?138114-When-Bench-Testing-Carb-Float-Levels-Should-Fuel-Be-Added-Under-Pressure&highlight=float+adjustment One thing that just occurred to me is to be very careful about making sure the carbs are very level when checking this wet. I'll put a level across my intake boots to verify that the bike is level on the center stand, and I'll do the same on these carbs when I bench test them wet again. Jeremy