RandyR Posted June 17, 2018 #26 Posted June 17, 2018 https://giant.gfycat.com/EntireGraciousBlackwidowspider.webm
WRIDR Posted June 17, 2018 #27 Posted June 17, 2018 Something rarely, or ever mentioned is the position the Insurer would take, IF you had an accident, AND it was firmly established that you were 'Lane Splitting'? Anybody seen, or experienced that scenario? Don't think they'd be amused; OR willing to pay up. Rgds, WRIDR
AABBCC Posted June 17, 2018 #28 Posted June 17, 2018 Something rarely, or ever mentioned is the position the Insurer would take, IF you had an accident, AND it was firmly established that you were 'Lane Splitting'? Anybody seen, or experienced that scenario? Don't think they'd be amused; OR willing to pay up. Rgds, WRIDR Speeding recklessly, aggressively passing, disregard for the traffic laws; may result in a collision, not an accident. The at fault insurance provider is required to pay out, up to the the limits of the liability coverage.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now