Venturous Randy Posted February 14, 2014 Share #1 Posted February 14, 2014 We just don't make them like we used to. RandyA http://www.wimp.com/crashtest/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hummingbird Posted February 14, 2014 Share #2 Posted February 14, 2014 I think the sad part is what they did to that '59' chevy, don't care if it is a 4 door Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dacheedah Posted February 14, 2014 Share #3 Posted February 14, 2014 crumple zones . . . they are lighter and better engineered. But have you tried to get an 8 track or cassette player today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyinfool Posted February 14, 2014 Share #4 Posted February 14, 2014 I also think that they cherry picked that specific model and year because it was the very first production car without a full frame, and no one had figured out how to really make a car with no frame yet. Had they gone to anything other than the 59 Bel-Air the results may have been different. The crash test I would love to see is a newer econo box with its 5 star crash rating, up against a full size HD pickup truck with its 3 star crash rating, head on at 65 MPH. I have bet my money and life on the HD pickup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiCarl Posted February 14, 2014 Share #5 Posted February 14, 2014 I also think that they cherry picked that specific model and year because it was the very first production car without a full frame, and no one had figured out how to really make a car with no frame yet. Had they gone to anything other than the 59 Bel-Air the results may have been different. I was wondering about that. It seemed to me that there should have been a frame rail sticking clear through the Malibu. The Bel-Air being frame-less explains a lot. Last month I hit some black ice with my '04 Colorado. When the wild ride stopped I went head on into the concrete barrier between me and the oncoming traffic. I was doing maybe 50 when it broke loose and the Colorado was totaled. It crumpled so nicely I didn't even have any bruises from the shoulder harness. I'd almost driven my '97 Yukon that day. I'll bet the Yukon would have been drivable after but don't know if I'd been able to drive it....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeWa Posted February 14, 2014 Share #6 Posted February 14, 2014 Oh man. That was a nice 59 Chev. I am not sure what they were trying to prove. I just don't see very many 59 Bel-Air econo box crashes. But that is just me. Perhaps there is an epidemic of old 50s vs new car crashes going around and I am just unaware. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now