sarges46 Posted October 30, 2010 #1 Posted October 30, 2010 Are they kidding? http://www.winnipegsun.com/news/weird/2010/10/29/15882931.html
Capt-D Posted October 30, 2010 #2 Posted October 30, 2010 This is just like the lady being fined for putting up a ad looking for a christian roomate, it was said that the the add was discriminatory, makes you wonder were this country is headed. VOTE November 4th
MiCarl Posted October 30, 2010 #3 Posted October 30, 2010 This is just like the lady being fined for putting up a ad looking for a christian roomate, it was said that the the add was discriminatory, makes you wonder were this country is headed. VOTE November 4th Liberals vote November 4. The rest vote November 2.
Guest scarylarry Posted October 30, 2010 #4 Posted October 30, 2010 This is just like the lady being fined for putting up a ad looking for a christian roomate, it was said that the the add was discriminatory, makes you wonder were this country is headed. VOTE November 4th 2nd???????
MikeWa Posted October 30, 2010 #5 Posted October 30, 2010 At now five years old the girl should just except full responsibility for her actions. Reach a settlement with the victim's family either through the courts or not. Then file bankruptcy. I mean how many assets can a five year old have? I am sorry for the family of the elderly woman but what a frivolous waste of time. Mike
Gray Ghost Posted October 30, 2010 #6 Posted October 30, 2010 They are suing the mother and father as well.
bongobobny Posted October 30, 2010 #7 Posted October 30, 2010 What some people won't do for money. **SIGH** Better read 1Timothy Chapter 6 with emphasis on verse 6...
wild hair 39 Posted October 30, 2010 #8 Posted October 30, 2010 thanks to our judges,more room at the,HOG TROFF TIME TO VOTE
kenw Posted October 30, 2010 #9 Posted October 30, 2010 A sign of the times! Another reason this country's going to hell!
ThomWill Posted October 30, 2010 #10 Posted October 30, 2010 A sign of the times! Another reason this country's going to hell! I don't know. According to the NY times, the judge's ruling (which I have not yet found to read) apparently cites precedents dating back to 1928. Apparently we have been this crazy for a long time.
Guest Swifty Posted October 30, 2010 #11 Posted October 30, 2010 Apparently we have been this crazy for a long time. .....the writing of a smart man. You're NOT wrong in this case.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now