craigatcsi Posted August 9, 2010 #1 Posted August 9, 2010 Since they appear more aerodynamic, do the 1st Generations get better gas mileage than the 2nd Generations?
Squidley Posted August 9, 2010 #3 Posted August 9, 2010 All depends on your rightwristitis ....just sayin'
Yammer Dan Posted August 9, 2010 #4 Posted August 9, 2010 All depends on your rightwristitis ....just sayin' Mine gets between 30 to 50 depending....
bendtdj Posted August 9, 2010 #5 Posted August 9, 2010 I get 38 to 42 depending on two up or solo. Better mileage without the ethanol in the gas. Dave
Venturous Randy Posted August 9, 2010 #6 Posted August 9, 2010 Mine gets about 41, 1-up on interstate and up to 49, 2-up easy riding. RandyA
craigatcsi Posted August 9, 2010 Author #7 Posted August 9, 2010 I wasn't really looking to find out how much they get, just better or worse. How abouts someone that has owned both?
Bummer Posted August 9, 2010 #8 Posted August 9, 2010 I've owned both. Still have the '85, though it needs a lot of polishing to bring it back up to speed. 167k miles extracts a toll on anything. I usually get in the low 30s. First Gen, Second Gen, it's really all about the wrist Squidley mentioned. (Last I heard, he has both too.) You see, I think I understand this engine, no matter which frame it's in. It has a sport bike soul. It likes to rev. So I rev it. The active First Genners talk, but I haven't had one leave me yet. Oh, sure, they might get ahead by a length or two, but if they falter, even a little, I'll be passing them. For me it's never been about mileage. I'm here for the pure joy this platform gives me. All that being said, the best answer I can give you is: 'bout the same.
Squidley Posted August 9, 2010 #9 Posted August 9, 2010 I've owned both. Still have the '85, though it needs a lot of polishing to bring it back up to speed. 167k miles extracts a toll on anything. I usually get in the low 30s. First Gen, Second Gen, it's really all about the wrist Squidley mentioned. (Last I heard, he has both too.) You see, I think I understand this engine, no matter which frame it's in. It has a sport bike soul. It likes to rev. So I rev it. The active First Genners talk, but I haven't had one leave me yet. Oh, sure, they might get ahead by a length or two, but if they falter, even a little, I'll be passing them. For me it's never been about mileage. I'm here for the pure joy this platform gives me. All that being said, the best answer I can give you is: 'bout the same. I concur professor And even though my 1st responce was an attempt at humor, all 8 of my Ventures got between 37 and 42 MPG with my riding style.
mm482 Posted August 9, 2010 #10 Posted August 9, 2010 (edited) My 2000 RVS and 2007 RSV gets better mileage than my 86 VR. Earl Edited August 10, 2010 by mm482
jburrell Posted August 9, 2010 #12 Posted August 9, 2010 My 2000 RVS and 2007 RSV gets better mileage my 86 VR. Earl INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW??????? If first gens are so fast and so good "How come all the first gen owners-----hold it----- Have Second gen bikes that they ride now????????? yet still have the first gen sitting around!! Sorry! Had to go there!!! Personally, I love my Second Gen and Hope someday to have a 3rd Gen and when that happens the 3rd Gen had certainly be better then the current 2 gen or I'll feel robbed. Of course I dont think I will ever "wear out" my second gen, since I only put atbout 16k miles a year on it and its only at 59k now.
1rooster Posted August 10, 2010 #13 Posted August 10, 2010 My 2nd gen with sidecar gets better mpg than my 1st gen and thats a fact.Have to stop every 100 miles and refill on the 1st gen and get 150-170 miles on the 2nd gen with sidecar before refueling.
mm482 Posted August 10, 2010 #14 Posted August 10, 2010 I like to have two bikes. The VR is more fun for short afternoon trips through back roads. The RSV is just more comfortable on long trips. The forward control and floor boards are a better fit for my bad knees. Earl
buddy Posted August 10, 2010 #15 Posted August 10, 2010 83 model best 37mpg 04 model best 42mpg Pretty close match but the 04 slightly better... plus 04 has a better ride and easier on my knees as well. Love the Second Gen. on long rides:)
FuzzyRSTD Posted August 10, 2010 #16 Posted August 10, 2010 I concur professor And even though my 1st responce was an attempt at humor, all 8 of my Ventures got between 37 and 42 MPG with my riding style. Ya, my bike gets around the 42 ish mark, depending on the Wrist factor. Wow Sqidley, you have owned 8 differant Ventures. Now that might be a record. I am going to start a thread to see how many Ventures or Royal Stars people here have owned. Nothing against other bikes or brands, just interested in the Yamha Venture and Tour Deluxe because I own one. I will go start thread now.... Good day... or night...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now