First_N_Last Posted April 14, 2010 Author Share #26 Posted April 14, 2010 (edited) April 14, 2010 LOG ---------------------------------------------------------- 2008 RSV Mileage: 24296 Rear Shock Pressure: 0 Front Shock Pressure: 4 Front Tire: Avon Venom 150/80B-16 AM42 - Rear Tire mounted reverse Date code: 4309 Max pressure: 50 Made In England Set pressure: 40 Rear Tire: Kumho Powerstar 758 165/80R-15 Max pressure: 44 Set pressure: 42 Hands free test at 75mph: no wobble (had wobble with OEM Dunlop) Accelerate from 70 to 90 on hill curving to left with 10 degree rise test: wobble... Oh Sweet Jesus wobble! (had wobble with OEM Dunlop) Now I plan on breaking the tire in for 1000 miles & then retesting before trying different things. johnb Edited June 30, 2010 by First_N_Last Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer Posted April 14, 2010 Share #27 Posted April 14, 2010 Interesting. Why no air in rear shocks? I usually keep mine around 25 and the front 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer Posted April 18, 2010 Share #28 Posted April 18, 2010 2009 RSV Mileage: 12060 Rear Shock Pressure: 30 Front Shock Pressure: 5 Front Tire: Pirelli MT66Route 150/80B-16 - Rear Tire mounted reverse Date code: 3709 Max pressure: 42 Set pressure: 40 Rear Tire: Kumho Powerstar 758 165/80R-15 Max pressure: 44 Set pressure: 40 Hands free test at 75mph: no wobble (had wobble with OEM Dunlop) Accelerate from 70 to 90 on hill curving to left with 10 degree rise test: No wobble - 2 up 90mph straight road test - 2 up no wobble (would have been faster, but rapidly succeeding head slaps from the pillion were giving me a headache) Hope to test again tomorrow, solo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footsie Posted April 20, 2010 Share #29 Posted April 20, 2010 I run no air in the rear also, just rides and handles better to me. and 28 lbs in the kumho. Gregg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer Posted April 27, 2010 Share #30 Posted April 27, 2010 OK, I reduce the air in rear shocks to 25lbs, all other stats are as previously reported. Got her up to 95 mph solo and could not tell if I really had a wobble or not. If I did it had to be very slight. Bad weather rolling in for this weekend so it may be a couple of more weeks before I can give a more definitive report. I must say, the Pirelli is doing a super job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billod Posted April 27, 2010 Share #31 Posted April 27, 2010 I currently have a worn OEM Dunlop on the front & am looking for a better replacement. A Pirelli rear reversed on the front? Have many done that & been happy? i have been running metme880s for 70,000 miles was getting 8000 on front but the last time i put a me880 rear reversed on front i now have 30,000 on it with no ill efects even in the rain a little cuping but thats nom still have 6mm of tread left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First_N_Last Posted May 5, 2010 Author Share #32 Posted May 5, 2010 Well I have been having thoughts on wobble at 85 & acceleration to 95. I developed a theory that aerodynamics may be the controlling factor. At my last meetup I noticed that my Venture had a much shorter/wider windshield than the other 33 Ventures there. To prove my theory, the best way would to buy & install a stock tall windshield. My problem with that is lack of money to buy it. I had to come up with a different method of testing. With the same height windshield, all I could do is lower my body height to below the height of the windshield I have... so I tucked my body down close to the tank like a sport bike rider & cranked the gas. There was no wobble. I think I have found the problem with my bike. The custom short windshield seems to enable the wobble with me sitting tall in the seat. Other than that, I now have 25065 miles on my bike & the tires are great so far. johnb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer Posted May 5, 2010 Share #33 Posted May 5, 2010 Well I have been having thoughts on wobble at 85 & acceleration to 95. I developed a theory that aerodynamics may be the controlling factor. At my last meetup I noticed that my Venture had a much shorter/wider windshield than the other 33 Ventures there. To prove my theory, the best way would to buy & install a stock tall windshield. My problem with that is lack of money to buy it. I had to come up with a different method of testing. With the same height windshield, all I could do is lower my body height to below the height of the windshield I have... so I tucked my body down close to the tank like a sport bike rider & cranked the gas. There was no wobble. I think I have found the problem with my bike. The custom short windshield seems to enable the wobble with me sitting tall in the seat. Other than that, I now have 25065 miles on my bike & the tires are great so far. johnb I don't think so. I have the stock windshield. As I said before I haven't had a chance to get much solo time because of the weather here in the great northwest, but with my wife at pillion I could not get a wobble at least up to 92 mph. When I rode solo I thought maybe just a tinge, but again I haven't had the opportunity to solo it yet. I do hope to this weekend. It will be cool, but as long as it doesn't snow again I'll get in some test riding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footsie Posted May 22, 2010 Share #34 Posted May 22, 2010 I have the short extra wide shield, i don't have any wobble. I have the kumho(32 psi) on back and Avon cobra radial(36 psi) on frount. no issues. Gregg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hummingbird Posted May 22, 2010 Share #35 Posted May 22, 2010 First_N_Last - are you going to make it up to Freebird's MD this year ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer Posted May 22, 2010 Share #36 Posted May 22, 2010 I have the short extra wide shield, i don't have any wobble. I have the kumho(32 psi) on back and Avon cobra radial(36 psi) on frount. no issues. Gregg I truly believe the key is in the tires. I have the Pirelli, but a radial up front may just be the answer. I'll have to wait to find out, cause I figure the Pirelli should be good for about 20,000 more miles. Until then I'll just slow down a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennTuc Posted May 26, 2010 Share #37 Posted May 26, 2010 Been reading with great interest beings what my front Avon Venom is about ready to be replaced. I had considerable wobble at first, but now after about 6K, I have not noticed a wobble in a long time. I think I'm going to go with the MT66 Route rear tire and reverse it for the front. I'm also running the Kuhmo on the rear. Glenn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First_N_Last Posted May 26, 2010 Author Share #38 Posted May 26, 2010 First_N_Last - are you going to make it up to Freebird's MD this year ? Hi Richard; I am not going to the June maintenance day in Ohio. Too many things already scheduled this year. Maybe next year???? Still have a wobble above 85mph. Current pressures are 36 for the Viper on the front & 36 for the Kumho on the rear. I'm taking off on a trip to Rochester, NY tomorrow AM & will end up putting about 1500 miles in 5 days. All my relatives seem to be getting cancer lately. I need to see them while I can. Multiple trips planned, which prevent an Ohio MD. john Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First_N_Last Posted June 30, 2010 Author Share #39 Posted June 30, 2010 (edited) June 29, 2010 LOG ---------------------------------------------------------- 2008 RSV Mileage: 27543 Front Avon installed at 24296 miles 27543-24296=3247) Rear Kumho installed at 21201 27543-21201=6342) Rear Shock Pressure: 20 Front Shock Pressure: 0 Lust Suspension Jack-Up Leveling Links Front Tire: Avon Venom 150/80B-16 AM42 - Rear Tire mounted reverse Date code: 4309 Max pressure: 50 Made In England Set pressure: 36 Rear Tire: Kumho Powerstar 758 165/80R-15 Max pressure: 44 Set pressure: 52 Hands free test at 75mph: no wobble Accelerate from 70 to 90 on hill curving to left with 10 degree rise test: no wobble As you lower the tire pressure below 50psi to as low as 32psi, the wobble problem returns, increases & the speed that the wobble becomes dangerous lowers. At 50psi the bike handling becomes what it should be... stable, grabbing & fast. My last tune will be a tall windshield attempt to check handling at speeds no one should ever travel at on these bikes, but... Front Avon tire & rear Kumho have very little sign of wear. johnb Edited June 30, 2010 by First_N_Last Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer Posted June 30, 2010 Share #40 Posted June 30, 2010 Are you not concerned about the over inflation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First_N_Last Posted June 30, 2010 Author Share #41 Posted June 30, 2010 Are you not concerned about the over inflation Of course I am concerned, but my wobble/swing problem seems to be some sort of Kumho tire problem which is fixed by over inflation. That fact makes me feel much better about the rest of my bike & it's equipment. It may just be that some Kumho tires are fine on our bikes & some are not. The handling difference for me between 32 psi & 50psi is incredible. The bike has great handling with 50psi. I hope to get by until this fall & replace my rear Kumho with an Avon Venom AM42 150/90BH-15 80H. I am almost done with my CT experiment. For my riding style, handling expectations & the roads I frequently ride on, the Kumho CT just doesn't do it. JohnB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer Posted June 30, 2010 Share #42 Posted June 30, 2010 Of course I am concerned, but my wobble/swing problem seems to be some sort of Kumho tire problem which is fixed by over inflation. That fact makes me feel much better about the rest of my bike & it's equipment. It may just be that some Kumho tires are fine on our bikes & some are not. The handling difference for me between 32 psi & 50psi is incredible. The bike has great handling with 50psi. I hope to get by until this fall & replace my rear Kumho with an Avon Venom AM42 150/90BH-15 80H. I am almost done with my CT experiment. For my riding style, handling expectations & the roads I frequently ride on, the Kumho CT just doesn't do it. JohnB. You know, it almost has to be the sidewalls of the CT. I'm happy with mine as I don't get any wobble til 87mph/gps and I've said I don't need to go that fast any who. Sorry it didn't work out for ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First_N_Last Posted June 30, 2010 Author Share #43 Posted June 30, 2010 You know, it almost has to be the sidewalls of the CT. I'm happy with mine as I don't get any wobble til 87mph/gps and I've said I don't need to go that fast any who. Sorry it didn't work out for ya. No worries, Ill still be putting my logs into this thread with some pictures of the tire wear also. Before I change out my Kumho, I will probably have at least 13000 miles on it. This is about the life of a stock tire, so no heartache for me. If I didn't have an s curve on my way to work with 30 degree angles and some 1 foot dips with a stiff bump in the middle of the 3 curves, I would probably be OK with the Kumho & just enjoy the increased mileage. Damn poor Richmond, VA expressway roads... 22 miles of drive each way to work with 10 miles of bad surface in it. Argh! Oh well; JohnB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Butler Posted June 30, 2010 Share #44 Posted June 30, 2010 You know guys (aka Darksiders), If you ride with a Kumho on the rear, why wouldn't you want to run a matching Kumho on the front? Or do they not make a 150/90-16? Just curious, Rick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunboat Posted June 30, 2010 Share #45 Posted June 30, 2010 now rick some folks have talked about doing this, but no one has. boy now you talk about sturing up the pot . now i have seen some pictures of early day motorcycles that have a c/t on the front. but these old bikes were a lot lighter than our rsv's. now as you or (may not know) i run a c/t on the back of my rsv. i for one am well pleased with it's preformance. but this is me, now as to puting a c/t on the front. this could get very, well you know. reguards don c. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First_N_Last Posted June 30, 2010 Author Share #46 Posted June 30, 2010 You know guys (aka Darksiders), If you ride with a Kumho on the rear, why wouldn't you want to run a matching Kumho on the front? Or do they not make a 150/90-16? Just curious, Rick I think that the only motorcycle I have ridden with a CT on the front & back was a 1939 Indian chief. It was also the motorcycle that i used to take the driving portion of my motorcycle drivers test. The soft side wall flexing would worry me on a front tire & keep me from trying it unless some made a RunFlat tire in the size needed. I strongly feel that RunFlat tires would make a CT on our Ventures OK. JohnB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First_N_Last Posted July 6, 2010 Author Share #47 Posted July 6, 2010 Well I have been having thoughts on wobble at 85 & acceleration to 95. I developed a theory that aerodynamics may be the controlling factor. At my last meetup I noticed that my Venture had a much shorter/wider windshield than the other 33 Ventures there. To prove my theory, the best way would to buy & install a stock tall windshield. My problem with that is lack of money to buy it. I had to come up with a different method of testing. With the same height windshield, all I could do is lower my body height to below the height of the windshield I have... so I tucked my body down close to the tank like a sport bike rider & cranked the gas. There was no wobble. I think I have found the problem with my bike. The custom short windshield seems to enable the wobble with me sitting tall in the seat. Other than that, I now have 25065 miles on my bike & the tires are great so far. johnb Well... I have installed a factory tall windshield & there was no difference between it & the short/wide windshield. The only sure method for me is to increase the Kumho psi to just over 50. johnB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
First_N_Last Posted July 11, 2010 Author Share #48 Posted July 11, 2010 Here are some pictures of my tires... Front Avon Venom with 3697 miles of wear... http://www.flickr.com/photos/77333083@N00/4781549774/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/77333083@N00/4780913073/http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4099/4781549774_090d4c53e1.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4135/4780913073_738c09bb3b.jpg Rear Kumho with 6792 miles of wear... http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4097/4780912523_653c7cfbb7.jpg http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4076/4781548344_323a246a05.jpg Both tires are wearing fine... JohnB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now