mini-muffin Posted June 4, 2009 Share #26 Posted June 4, 2009 I would say she can be sued in civil court. And if they don't do much to her I hope the family does. I still can't understand how someone could think painting their nails is ok while driving. Margaret Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutureVentures Posted September 23, 2009 Author Share #27 Posted September 23, 2009 Maybe there is justice after all: WAUKEGAN, Ill. - Lake County authorities say a driver accused of painting her nails when she hit and killed a motorcyclist has turned herself. Prosecutors say 48-year-old Lora L. Hunt of Morris was indicted on six counts of reckless homicide by a Lake County grand jury on Wednesday. She surrendered Thursday and was released on $10,000 bail. Police say Hunt told them shortly after the May 2 accident that she was applying red polish to her nails as she drove at about 50 mph toward an intersection and did not see motorcyclist Anita Zaffke until after she hit her. The 56-year-old Zaffke, who lived in Lake Zurich, was stopped at a traffic signal when she was struck. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-nailpolishdeath,0,4080674.story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mini-muffin Posted September 23, 2009 Share #28 Posted September 23, 2009 Guess that is some good news.I still can't understand painting your nails while driving. I have a hard enough time doing that sitting still in the house without making a bit of a mess. Margaret Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footsie Posted September 23, 2009 Share #29 Posted September 23, 2009 She a nurse, we spend years in college become a Nurse, many hours yearly doing inservice training from everything to what to eat, to yes the dangers of traffic, seatbelts, car seats, bike safety, and yes I did inservice last on drivers multi-tasking behind the wheel. Too look at every possible danger to our patient's and their famlies, she knows better, I would be ready to wager she has seen the damage first hand. If she ever worked in the ER, OR, ICU. We are supposed to watch out for people, we are sworn TO DO NO HARM. anywhere. I hope put her under the jail, just after they take Her Nursing licence. She has disgraced us all. Gregg Mathis RN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Posted September 24, 2009 Share #30 Posted September 24, 2009 You can't fix STUPID. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckShot Posted September 24, 2009 Share #31 Posted September 24, 2009 We all hate to see something like this happen to a biker let alone anyone, from a child walking to someone else in a car. In today's world, most people think it is their right to drive--Everyone should remember that it is a priveledge. Sad but true, accidents do happen. But when they happen because of gross neglegence, the courts need impose a very stiff penelty. The fact that the family could file a civil suit and gain some monitary value does not replace her life,and the insurance company would be paying, not the unintelegent woman that caused the accident. If the monetary value is more than what the insurance will cover, then and only then would she be responsable for the balance. Where do the judges draw the line---is taking a drink of water gross negligence while driving? How many of us men are guilty of taking a second glance at a pretty woman walking on the sidewalk. You have just been distracted from your driving. We need to be careful what we wish for. Every year priveledges and rights get more confusing. Sometimes for the worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutureVentures Posted March 1, 2010 Author Share #32 Posted March 1, 2010 Just a quick update on the biker, Anita Zaffke that will killed last year at a red light by Lora Hunt, the finger nail painter. Trial is scheduled for April 12th, 6 counts of reckless homicide. http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/newssun/news/2041534,5_1_WA11_NAILS_S1-100211.article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a1bummer Posted March 1, 2010 Share #33 Posted March 1, 2010 I see they keep pointing out that Anita Zaffke was wearing a helmet. That's great, but what difference does it make? It seems like superfluous information to me. Or am I not understanding why they keep mentioning it? It reminds me of a conversation I had with a couple acquaintances. They figured that if a motorcyclist, who wasn't doing anything wrong, wasn't wearing a helmet and got hit my a car that "Didn't see them", and got killed, that it would be the motorcyclists own fault they're dead. I argued that it would be the person driving the car that wasn't paying attention that would be at fault, PERIOD! I just don't understand some peoples ways of rationalizing things. I also don't understand why we keep passing new laws that are supposed to protect us from other peoples stupidity when we don't bother to enforce them or any of the other laws that are already in effect for similar reasons. Unless of course there's an "accident". Then maybe we'll think about it. Every day I see these laws being ignored. But I'm just another citizen. Not a cop. So what can I do about about it? Nothing! So why should any of these people care if anybody sees them breaking these laws if it isn't a cop who is catching them in the act? I just don't think any of these laws are being taken seriously. Just my Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mini-muffin Posted March 1, 2010 Share #34 Posted March 1, 2010 Thanks for the update. I had been wondering about that case. I also agree the mention of the helmet is kinda pointless. I guess it's to emphasis that the person riding was following the rules and trying to protect themselves. Unfortunately you can't protect yourself from someone who plows into you. Margaret Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wes0778 Posted March 1, 2010 Share #35 Posted March 1, 2010 Unfortunately you can't protect yourself from someone who plows into you. Margaret And the sad part (if there is a sadder part) is if she had tried to get out of the way and was killed by cross traffic, there would have been BIG headlines that: a motorcyclist was killed when she ran a red light! We cannot win!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutureVentures Posted March 1, 2010 Author Share #36 Posted March 1, 2010 Thanks for the update. I had been wondering about that case. I also agree the mention of the helmet is kinda pointless. I guess it's to emphasis that the person riding was following the rules and trying to protect themselves. Unfortunately you can't protect yourself from someone who plows into you. Margaret Not only was she wearing a helmet, she also had a neon green (yellow?) jacket on too, apparently she was VERY safety conscious. I think mentioning the helmet answers the one question people often ask, not that it would have mattered since she was hit at 50+ mph from behind. Kinda similar to the question I think of when I hear of people being ejected from a car, were they wearing a seatbelt? As things progress, I'll try to keep the updates coming. Her son created a really nice website: http://www.blacknailbrigade.com/ Here's a pic of her in her jacket. How can you not see this??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a1bummer Posted March 1, 2010 Share #37 Posted March 1, 2010 Ya know, now that you guys point it out, I should have gotten that color of rain gear instead of the black and gray ones I did get. They have the reflective stripes like in the picture. But still, on a dark, rainy, and cloudy freeway, that bright green or yellow is much better. Hind sight is 20/20 as they say. And you absolutely right. With that suit on... you almost have to try not seeing a person. That being said, I did have a guy in an LTD pull out in front of me in my old wrecker. I wondered how he could NOT have seen me. It wasn't a small truck and it had a large light bar and a great big boom-lift on the back. He hit me hard enough to push me over quite a ways. It was an 9000 lb. truck! Luckily it was a city side street and I was only doing about 15 mph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cf_collins Posted March 22, 2010 Share #38 Posted March 22, 2010 Ya know, now that you guys point it out, I should have gotten that color of rain gear instead of the black and gray ones I did get. They have the reflective stripes like in the picture. But still, on a dark, rainy, and cloudy freeway, that bright green or yellow is much better. Hind sight is 20/20 as they say. And you absolutely right. With that suit on... you almost have to try not seeing a person. That being said, I did have a guy in an LTD pull out in front of me in my old wrecker. I wondered how he could NOT have seen me. It wasn't a small truck and it had a large light bar and a great big boom-lift on the back. He hit me hard enough to push me over quite a ways. It was an 9000 lb. truck! Luckily it was a city side street and I was only doing about 15 mph. We live in the "me generation:Im not listening to", nobody care about anyone else anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutureVentures Posted May 7, 2010 Author Share #39 Posted May 7, 2010 There's no joy in this for anyone but, the driver painting her fingernails that killed Anita Zaffke was found guilty. Sentencing to occur later, probation is an option... http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/northnorthwest/ct-met-nail-polish-trial-0507-20100506,0,7086850.story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenw Posted May 7, 2010 Share #40 Posted May 7, 2010 I find the lawyers argument intersting. According to him if I load my gun with no thought of using and later I shoot someone I guess it would be only an accident. The only difference between a lawyer and a skunk in the road is there are skid marks in front of the skunk. Just my thoughts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkuhr Posted May 7, 2010 Share #41 Posted May 7, 2010 http://www.wbko.com/home/headlines/7028902.html high on drugs, cross centerline and head-on group of 4 scoots, kills 2 mains 1 and 1 lucked out gets off with slap on wrist go figure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutureVentures Posted May 7, 2010 Author Share #42 Posted May 7, 2010 http://www.wbko.com/home/headlines/7028902.html high on drugs, cross centerline and head-on group of 4 scoots, kills 2 mains 1 and 1 lucked out gets off with slap on wrist go figure Wow, that's sickening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiCarl Posted May 7, 2010 Share #43 Posted May 7, 2010 The driver received a felony reckless homicide conviction yesterday. Link to article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wes0778 Posted May 8, 2010 Share #44 Posted May 8, 2010 I noted that her weasel, uh lawyer, thought she was unfairly being made an example of. Well DAMN-IT THAT is exactly as it SHOULD BE!!! I wish laws were such that she could spend several hours each day of her sentence (rain or shine) sitting in front of the court house holding a sign saying "I'll never again paint my nails while driving!!!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LilBeaver Posted May 8, 2010 Share #45 Posted May 8, 2010 (edited) I noted that her weasel, uh lawyer, thought she was unfairly being made an example of. Well DAMN-IT THAT is exactly as it SHOULD BE!!! ... Actually, I couldn't agree more with the lawyer. Crap like this has been happening FAR TOO LONG for this to be the 'example case'... However, I certainly won't argue with it, since it FINALLY HAPPENED. Now that the precedent is set, hopefully the rates of these incidents will decline sooner. Edited May 8, 2010 by LilBeaver clarification Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N3FOL Posted May 8, 2010 Share #46 Posted May 8, 2010 I didn't read the article other than what was posted here but... is it the victim's blood and urine or the person who hit her that they're checking? From the article, my understanding that it is the victim's blood and uring results DA is waiting for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N3FOL Posted May 8, 2010 Share #47 Posted May 8, 2010 As is usually the case, the driver of the cage will probably face only minimal charges and no jail time. Kill a biker, go to jail! - should be the norm. True, but I hope the victim's family members get expert legal advice and hire a lawyer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scooter Bob Posted May 8, 2010 Share #48 Posted May 8, 2010 There's no joy in this for anyone but, the driver painting her fingernails that killed Anita Zaffke was found guilty. Sentencing to occur later, probation is an option... http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/northnorthwest/ct-met-nail-polish-trial-0507-20100506,0,7086850.story Thanks for the update. I'll be putting this on the agenda for our ABATE meeting Tuesday night. We've been following this all along. We'll probably discuss it today during our Motorcycle Awareness Rally in Beaver Dam. We'll be holding up awareness signs for a couple hours on a busy street. Hope it helps wake up a few people. As it is, one of our newer members will be sitting in a chair holding a sign that says "this is what happens when you don't look twice" He has 13 broken bones in his foot from a left turn cager that "didn't see him" a week ago. Thanks Again, Scooter Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gidzhome Posted May 10, 2010 Share #49 Posted May 10, 2010 I attended the memorial ride Anita's son arranged. There were ~500 bikes in attendence. I hear Hunt got up to 5 years in prison last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutureVentures Posted May 10, 2010 Author Share #50 Posted May 10, 2010 I attended the memorial ride Anita's son arranged. There were ~500 bikes in attendence. I hear Hunt got up to 5 years in prison last week. Yeah, I really wanted to make that ride, as it was in my general area but other things prevented me. Lora Hunt hasn't been sentenced yet, she could get up to 5 years or she could just get probation. I'm guessing, sadly, she'll get probation and I hope I'm wrong. Poignant article written yesterday, Mother's day: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-05-09/news/ct-met-nail-polish-0509-20100509_1_anita-zaffke-remembering-nail-polish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now